Why Spanish language is still alive in the Philippines

Refuting the Claim: The Philippines as a Non-Spanish-Speaking Country

The Philippines is not a Spanish-speaking country and my goal is to refute the same claim by Esquire Philippines writer Angelica Gutierrez. She claim that the Philippines is the only former Spanish colony not speaking Spanish and they keep on posting on social media. It is true in terms of the widespread and daily usage of the language, but it ignores the subtle ways Spanish language and culture have deeply embedded themselves in Philippine society. We have to look at history, linguistics, and the lingering cultural imprints that prove Spanish lingers, subtly, in the Philippines.

1. Historical Legacy and the Spanish Language Among the Elite

Spanish did indeed become the language of the elite, the educated, and the political class in the Philippines during the Spanish colonial era. For centuries, Spanish was taught in schools and was the primary language of government and literature. True, the Spanish friars focused on learning local languages like Tagalog and Cebuano to spread their religious teachings, but Spanish was adopted by the upper classes and those involved in governance.

Prominent Filipino writers like the works of José Rizal, "Noli Me Tángere" and "El Filibusterismo," to name a few, used their language to awaken national consciousness. The Spanish language came not only as a shadow of colonial power but in the very mouth of how resistance, reform, and an identity would be expressed: though the use of it declined, especially after its colonization by the Americans but never fully disappeared.

Also, most of the 82 provinces in the Philippines are named in Spanish language. The notable provinces with names ending in Spanish words like del Norte, del Sur, Occidental, and Oriental. My home province of Isabela was even named after the Queen Isabella II of Spain, the name of our country which is the Philippines is named after the King Philip. Another example is the municipality of Reina Mercedes which is also in Isabela is notably the most royal address in the world.

2. Integration of Spanish in Filipino Languages

No one can deny that the legacy left by the Spanish is very strong when it comes to the languages used in the Philippines. Tagalog, Cebuano, Ilocano, and the regional languages are so filled with Spanish loan words that hundreds of words spoken every day in the country come from Spanish. The following are some examples of words used daily in the Philippines: mesa (table), silla (chair), kutsilyo (knife), gatas (milk), sapatos (shoes), and even numero (number).

Apart from basic words, some Filipino cultural practices retain a system of idiomatic phrases, counts, and other linguistic tools brought about by the Spanish that remained intact to this very day in certain circles such as among the elder ones or those who grew up within some parts of Zamboanga City. There is also the case wherein younger generations, without the actual knowledge of the subject matter, use Chavacano, the locally-influenced version of the Tagalog that blends local with Spanish tongues for people of their area. Being this type of Creole proves itself as evidence of how effective it is for Spanish not only in being retained over generations but also as able to integrate with native tongue even further.

3. The Position of the Spanish Language in School Education and in the Religion

Even though the Spanish Language is no longer prevalent in this country, which had been occupied by the Americans, it was studied in schools for centuries until, as recently as in the middle of the last century. In fact, until constitutional revision in 1987, there was, in the Philippines, an obligatory Philippine curriculum subject and, therefore, most of those living today have retained at least some familiarity with Spanish as part of their education.

In religious activities, influence from Spain is also strongly displayed. Their language in praying, hymns sung, and even terminologies used in religious gatherings were still derived from prayers through Santo Niño or the Holy Child, Nuestra Señora, the Our Lady, or terms like Hermanos (which means Brothers). It presents historical assimilation of Spanish to Filipino spirit under the tradition of Pasyon, which is a chant describing how Christ suffered during the Passion observed during Holy Week.

4. Revival and Modern Interest in the Spanish Language

In fact, recent developments showed the renewed interests about the Spanish language among the people of the Philippines. Various educational institutions, private schools that teach languages, and organizations in culture offer their course programs in Spanish for, apart from historical, cultural, and economic purposes, these are important relations for the two nations involved: the Philippines and Spain. Ties of Spain with the Philippines have been promoted through bilateral cultural programs as this will help to rejuvenate common heritage shared between two nations.

The boom in globalization and the increasing significance of Spanish as a global language is also a reason behind this resurgent interest. For a vast Hispanic market has started opening up, along with much economic potential related to countries speaking the Spanish language. Many professionals now consider it their advantage to be conversant with Spanish.

Conclusion: Spanish is Not Yet Over as a Lingua Philippines

Indeed, Spanish is no longer the lingua franca of the Philippines, unlike in other former Spanish colonies in Latin America. But to dismiss the Philippines as a non-Spanish-speaking country is to miss all the linguistic and cultural subtleties that continue to tie the nation to its Spanish past. From the rich blend of Spanish vocabulary in everyday speech to renewed interest in language learning and cultural programs, part of the Filipino identity is Spanish but not at the helm.

This would essentially oversimplify the case, claiming that the Philippines is now free of all of its Spanish roots. Of course, it runs much deeper and is wedged into the very fabric of culture, history, and even modern consciousness. Left, it may no longer be as dominant as once viewed and felt, but this lives on in constant repetition across generations, reminding the Filipino of a shared past, which defines their country's future and present.

Life in the Philippine provinces

5 Reasons Why Living in Rural Provinces Can Be Your Best Choice

Living in the province has always been romanticized as a peaceful, laid-back alternative to the fast-paced, stress-filled environment of the city. While there are undeniable challenges to rural living, it's time to look beyond the negatives and explore the many benefits that come with life in one of the 82 provinces of the Philippines. If you plan to leave the cities in Metro Manila, here are five reasons why living in a rural province could be the best decision you'll ever make.

This blog is just a response to the article written by Kristoffer Jan Notario.

1. Closer connection to nature and a healthier lifestyle

The most important reason to move to the province is reconnecting with nature. Rural areas often have mountains, rice fields, or coastal regions nearby, so the view is always scenic and the air is always fresh. Nature connection through outdoor activities, such as hiking, swimming, or gardening, enhances a healthier lifestyle.

Being away from town also reduces exposure to noise pollution and the frantic pace which largely contributes to stress. Researchers have shown that having a period in nature brings down the levels of cortisol and helps in boosting global mental health. To stay an even more harmonized and conscious life, peace and tranquility surrounding such provinces cannot be over-shadowed.

2. Relatively Low Cost of Life

Probably one of the advantages of staying in the province is that it is cheap to live compared to being in the city. There is housing, and in general, cost of day-to-day activities such as food and transportation is affordable. It may not have a booming job market such as Metro Manila, but your income would stretch longer.

Provinces are filled with local produce and seafood sold at much cheaper prices, too. For people who love cooking or eating fresh and organic food, going to local markets would benefit them with the convenience of being able to acquire something they can prepare and taste. Also, community culture often involves sharing fruits, vegetables, or home-cooked meals with neighbors, saving more money for living costs.

3. Deeper Sense of Community

It is common for a number of years that people spend their lives living in apartments or houses with the same neighbors and maybe some friends in a city, but this is quite contrary to life in a province. It becomes deeply rooted in community values. These individuals in the provinces have known each other and cared for one another, thus calming them for such feelings.

From town fiestas to volunteer efforts and community-based projects, there are so many ways to get to know people and become part of a close-knit community. This connectedness is especially helpful for families that want to raise their children in a supportive and friendly environment. The communal atmosphere not only helps to build lasting relationships but also fosters responsibility towards helping one's community prosper.

4. Opportunities for a More Sustainable Lifestyle

The province is the perfect place for a more sustainable way of living. With open spaces and fertile land, rural areas provide opportunities for gardening, farming, and even raising livestock. Many people who move to the provinces find joy and fulfillment in growing their own food, which can significantly reduce reliance on store-bought goods and promote a healthier diet.

In addition to farming and gardening, the natural setting of a non-commercialized province automatically reduces one's carbon footprint. Commuting distances are short, and many of its residents bike or walk around, thus creating lesser air pollution. The province is perfect for those who give importance to environmental friendly practices and wish to have a simpler and more sustainable lifestyle.

5. Slow Pace of Life and Much More Meaning

It's really just racing amidst city life when people see work deadlines looming near. They go along amidst traffics in this or that, constantly bothered with every kind of activities buzzing there. With regard to life, though, one seems to appreciate having such opportunities for relaxation when going in for living within a slower provincial lifestyle-a slower style which helps provide greater depth to think better for your ideas as well as gain better balancing from it within the setting at large.

The peace and quiet of a rural life can be inspiration for those who work at home or have the means to pursue creative activities, such as writing, painting, or crafting. Individuals can focus on their passion without the pressure of hustle and bustle in a city, finding fulfillment away from work. This, in turn, can contribute to a more meaningful life, centered on what actually matters: relationships, self-care, and personal development.

Final Thoughts: The Province as an Option for Happiness

Even if it's more difficult to live in the province, the pros mostly offset the cons when individuals have a strong need to have life surrounded by nature, people, and ease. Provincial living has options to maintain a less costly way of life and supports an ecological lifestyle that further adds up to being there in terms of community familiarity, so it can serve not only as an option but as a great preference for those who value those kinds of things. Certainly, it is not for everybody, especially those who thrive on the conveniences of city living. However, for those who prioritize peace, health, and genuine human connection, the rural provinces of the Philippines offer a quality of life that is unmatched.

So, before you write off the idea of living in the province, take some time to weigh these positives. You might find that the great benefits align perfectly with the life you dream of—one rich with experience, community spirit, and meaningful simplicity.

What if Leni-Kiko won?

Why Leni as President and Kiko as VP Won't Change the 1987 Constitution—But Could still Affect their Reputations

If Leni Robredo and Kiko Pangilinan had won the 2022 Philippine presidential election as against Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. (BBM) and Sara Duterte, they would, at best, have operated their governance through a principle of reform, transparency, and continuity rather than a 'rude shock' character.

One thing they wouldn't touch is the 1987 Philippine Constitution. For all their intentions to uphold democratic values and maintain stability, the same Constitution could ironically become a factor that challenges and potentially damages their political reputations. Here's why the 1987 Constitution could become a double-edged sword for Leni and Kiko.

1. The 1987 Constitution as Symbol of Stability and Democracy.

It is in this regard that the Constitution of 1987 is a product of Ferdinand Marcos Sr., the father of BBM, authoritarian rule, and it was drafted under Corazon Aquino to safeguard from the abuses felt during Martial Law. Indeed, Bill of Rights, term limits, and separation of powers are all there to ensure no leader could establish himself to be a permanent force or that government apparatuses be for personal gain.

For personalities like Leni Robredo and Kiko Pangilinan, the 1987 Constitution would be an operative norm to act according to. They would subscribe to it as a sign of democratic resilience, allowing the people of the Philippines to feel comfortable with knowing that their government respects civil liberties and is not going to abuse its powers.

It is, therefore not surprising that they do not look at changing it lightly; it would be seen as challenging the very values they represent.

2. Public Perception and the "Anti-Charter Change" Stand

Both Leni and Kiko have been loud in opposition to charter change, also known as Cha-Cha, which many believe would open the door to corrupt officials extending their term or even changing provisions protecting citizens' rights. Rigidity of the 1987 Constitution in certain areas is said to be an antidote to political self-interest; the public does not really trust leaders who push for changes. Had Leni and Kiko tried to change the Constitution, they may have been accused of wanting to do so for certain reasons, even if this was not their intention. They would probably stay firm on an "anti-charter change" stance so as not to invite those controversies and lose the trust of their supporters. Their core constituency, which includes progresses, pro-democracy forces, and human rights groups, might view any effort to change the Constitution as a sellout to the values they espouse.

3. The 1987 Constitution as a Restraining Factor in Government Operations

The main drawback of the 1987 Constitution is its age and some outdated provisions that do not well serve the present needs and challenges of the Philippines. While it has ensured the safeguarding of democracy, it also creates huge difficulties in economic reform, foreign investment restrictions, and local governance structures. As progressive leaders, Leni and Kiko might be frustrated that constitutional limitations will restrain them from implementing substantial reforms. If they wanted to open certain industries to more foreign investments to spur economic growth or to adjust social welfare programs, they would be limited by restrictions that could break or weaken efforts.

It was in such an event, the inflexibility within the Constitution was very dangerous to their rule to seem ineffective or unable to do desirable change.

4. Economic and social issues that need reform

Leni Robredo has been a consistent advocate for inclusive economic growth, a respite from poverty, and social welfare programs. Still, other experts say that several provisions on foreign investment, tenurial rights, and the role of the state in the economy may contradict efforts to achieve these ends in the 1987 Constitution. She would not want to tinker with the Constitution, but the lack of flexibility might mean stalled reforms, slower economic growth, and public discontent.

For instance, the Constitution's strict limits on foreign ownership and investment protect Filipino interests but also repel much-needed foreign capital that could spur growth, create jobs, and modernize infrastructure. With economic impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic and global inflation, the pressure on any administration to boost growth is immense.

In that case, any constitutional barrier which would hinder their administration in generating economic development would haunt and hurt their reputation both for the believers and skeptics.

5. Constitutional Checks on National Security and Crimes Issues

Another area that may affect them in their administration is restrictions from the Constitution on issues related to national security measures. For instance, the constitutional provisions of separation of power and other provisions may provide some constraints on quick moves on pressing issues such as illegal drugs, crime, and insurgency.

In the government of Leni-Kiko, the approach may likely include community-based programs and more human rights approach in resolving crime issues rather than in an aggressive way under the Duterte administration. Still, whenever the crime rates continue or the security issue deteriorates, the critics will view the unwillingness of such an administration to think of constitutional reforms especially with the aspect of national security, as a weakness. If an administration appears lenient or constricted by archaic laws, its reputation among the populace desiring decisive actions could suffer. Constitutional restraints could not impose measures as aggressive as desired by public perception, which may have given Leni and Kiko an image of inefficiency or "soft" when it comes to criminals that will affect their political positioning.

6. The Risk of Stagnation and the Blame Game

One of the most significant risks that would be posed by not amending the Constitution is political stagnation. In the system, it takes a long time to process government matters and, therefore, may take years to implement policies because of bureaucratic red tape and structural inefficiencies. With Leni and Kiko at the helm, limitations of the 1987 Constitution may prevent them from making swift changes in place, and their administration will be branded as "too slow" or "ineffective." Opponents and critics will most likely play on such issues by claiming that the administration is not living up to its promise or really making much headway. Ironically, as Leni and Kiko would prefer to leave the Constitution as a matter of respect for democratic processes, they would still be faulted for the same lapses of the system that would remain unchanged. This would make the public lose confidence in the government, especially when they start comparing their performance unfavorably with other leaders who might take more aggressive, albeit less democratic, actions.

7. The Difficulty of Dealing with Contemporary Issues without Contemporary Instruments

Issues such as climate change, digital governance, international diplomacy, and cybercrime in the globalized world of the 21st century require modern tools and adaptable systems. Thus, the 1987 Constitution, although effective in its time, lacks specific frameworks to address these modern challenges comprehensively. If they are to be constant only according to the Constitution like this, then Leni and Kiko will indeed ally with the more advanced age groups, and therefore this may constrain them only for fewer ways to respond based on new issues. Thought impossibility of handling these concerns of the moment armed only with antiquated arsenals only fuels more riots to further scrutinize. Its image, however, was bruised when trying to overcome the current challenges in such an archaic system, while its values and intentions were aligned with what best served the public. Conclusion: A Double-Edged Sword of Defending Democratic Values In a way, while Leni Robredo and Kiko Pangilinan will probably be for the 1987 Constitution in showing respect for democracy and in commitment to transparency, it is ironic that the limitation of the Constitution will be the frustration and damage to their reputations. In not being able to advocate for constitutional amendments, they will remain in the good books of those who fear Cha-Cha, but they'll also be perceived as weak leaders held captive by the old system. The paradox here is that even though Leni and Kiko's adherence to the 1987 Constitution would demonstrate their commitment to democratic values, it could also set them up for criticism and potential political damage. In today's rapidly evolving world, staying true to the Constitution might uphold democratic integrity but hinder the ability to enact meaningful, timely changes. This would pose a tricky dilemma for Leni and Kiko between respect for the democratic foundation in the nation and responsiveness to the demands of modern Filipino society.

Everyone deserves a second chance

Jessica Soho rejects Vice Ganda guesting on 'KMJS' for the second time: The lasting effect of a scandalous joke.

News about showbiz in the Philippines usually boils down to who is fighting with whom, who has teamed up with whom, and who has reconciled with whom. But then there are some controversies that just do not seem to go away, leaving it all unsettled even years after the controversy first arose. One such controversy involves GMA's respected journalist Jessica Soho and comedian Vice Ganda, who have been at odds once again recently over Vice Ganda's bid to be a guest on Soho's show, Kapuso Mo, Jessica Soho (KMJS).

The History Behind the Brawl

The Jessica Soho and Vice Ganda feud began over a decade ago, when Vice Ganda performed at the Araneta Coliseum on May 2013. In his concert, he made a joke that everyone considered offensive, insensitive, and very inappropriate. This joke made reference to Soho, involving very sensitive themes like gang violence and sexual assault. Vice Ganda's punchline belittled the idea of Soho, that respected figure in journalism, in a "gang rape" scenario with accompanying jokes about food. The remark quickly became sparks for outrage from netizens and personalities who condemned it to be offensive and distasteful.

Jessica Soho herself, who is respected for professionalism and commitment to journalistic integrity, was reportedly hurt by the joke. The reaction compelled Vice Ganda to apologize publicly on air, but the damage between them had already been inflicted. Subsequent years passed with Soho's reaction setting the definition of the extent of boundaries of humor and respect that should not overstep in entertainment. Indeed, viewers sympathized, saying some jokes are taken too far and cross certain ethical limits.

Vice Ganda's Chance to Reconnect

Cut to the present, Vice Ganda has been working for months at the compound of GMA on It's Showtime. One of the flagship shows of ABS-CBN was the noontime show that was given a new home on GMA platforms when the franchise was not renewed. This gave Vice Ganda a chance to get closer to GMA's programs and viewers.

Vice Ganda and his team believe that guesting in KMJS, one of GMA's most-watched programs hosted by Jessica Soho, can further help promote new segments on It's Showtime and give the comedian an exposure to his upcoming MMFF entry this December. However, reportedly, Soho declined for the second time despite the ratings boost it would bring along with it as well as the "media moment" that would surely come along with it. According to sources, she felt that Vice Ganda as a guest would become a "media circus" and does not deserve her kind of show on KMJS.

Public Reactions and Social Media Buzz

Soho's denial of Vice's appearance at the show immediately gained ripples online. Many netizens said they supported Soho's decision since what happened was justified and understandable concerning Vice's past joke. They said that Soho, who spent her career advocating credibility and responsible journalism, must still be stung by that experience up to this day. Some commented that Soho's decision not to include Vice Ganda on her show was a statement on respect and accountability, especially with sensitive topics.

However, there is hope for reconciliation. They say time has passed, and Vice Ganda has since been reformed in his comedic approach, moving away from topics that are controversial, instead working to deliver humor that does not cross personal or ethical boundaries. The fans wondered if Soho and Vice Ganda could reconcile, considering they are under the same network umbrella.

Can reconciliation happen?

While both share the same professional space in GMA, being able to put aside personal grievances isn't always easy. For Soho, hurt is not just a word when Vice Ganda said it way back 2013. It may feel like a very personal attack on her dignity. For Vice Ganda, having Soho decline his guest appearance twice might mean that there's still work to be done in terms of mending their relationship, if that's even possible.

Forgiveness is such a hard process, and in a public conflict such as this, sometimes it requires one to recognize the past yet move forward respecting each other's boundaries. Vice Ganda said sorry regarding his comment about Soho, but if that effort to reconcile would be enough to change Soho's attitude, only time will tell.

A Lesson in Accountability and Sensitivity in Comedy

This reminds me how much weight words and jokes carry, especially said to public figures who have built their lives around principles and hard work. This is meant to be humorous, yet at the same time provoke thought as they hurt and belittle the person. Even with a profession that pushes boundaries to the extreme, there's still the responsibility of respect for others and how much comedy can influence the mind.

This decision by Jessica Soho to turn down Vice Ganda for guesting says much about accountability. She has, in the entertainment and media world, seen that both actions and words can be unforgiving in their consequence. For viewers, this is a testament to taking a stand against dignity and values, no matter what reconciliation may serve professionally.

Looking Ahead: Will They Make Amends?

As It's Showtime remains on the air on GMA, viewers are itching to know if the two personalities will ever work things out, especially since Vice Ganda wants to guest on KMJS this December to promote his movie. That would be a much-publicized pardon if Soho actually extends an olive branch, and such a reconciliation may actually usher in not just a new page for themselves but also for their fans.

For now, though, the future is blank. Jessica Soho shows that in refusing to be a guest of Vice Ganda, values and boundaries do matter in this world of show business, respect and accountability having to be learned and adhered to. Whether these two public figures can make their differences fade away is to be seen, but this story about them teaches so many in the entertainment world and beyond.

And will Vice Ganda be forgiven by Jessica Soho in the end? Only time can tell. For now, we can all take this as a reminder of respect, accountability, and how our words can really linger, both in and out of the spotlight.